Their supposed commitment to reducing their ecological footprint is mostly greenwashing. Even if Ba&sh uses some lower-impact materials, like organic cotton, there’s no real evidence they’re taking meaningful action to reduce water usage or other environmental harms.
When it comes to workers’ rights, Ba&sh is a disaster. Not only for the workers in their European shops, but the final stages of production are outsourced to countries with extreme risks of labor abuse. There’s no evidence that the brand ensures financial security for its suppliers, which can lead to poor working conditions and low wages. There's also no indication that they support diversity or inclusion in their supply chain—despite claiming to audit most of their suppliers, this means little without real accountability.
And for those who are hoping to support brands that have stopped exploiting animals: Ba&sh is far from where they claim to be!! If you genuinely want to avoid animal suffering in the production of your clothes, please don’t shop here. They do not trace their animal-derived materials properly, and there’s no proof that animals are not harmed in the process. Many of these animal products come from China, and most of their "evidence" of cruelty free comes directly from their own marketing—not from independent third parties. Ba&sh has released a generic statement about minimizing animal suffering, but it has no formal animal welfare policy. The brand appears to use leather, wool, and exotic animal hair, yet offers no concrete proof that these materials are sourced ethically. They have neither control over, nor seem interested in overseeing, the full supply chain from A to Z.
Titles are just titles. Animal suffering must stop—especially for clothing that’s this overpriced and still doesn’t meet basic quality expectations.
Submitted July 10, 2025 at 05:52PM by Business_Pangolin798 https://ift.tt/PUx6TJ4
No comments:
Post a Comment